I just found Sports on my Mind through one of Giantsrainman’s backtalker rants and wow have I been asleep. D. K. Wilson who is sometimes published in the Chicago Sports analyse and used to create verbally for the Starting Five goes on and on and on about Barry Bonds taking my instinctive rantings and filling them out with far greater detail and research than I undergo either the time nor the inclination to do; and he nails it on just about every count. I undergo already made a dress to my lineup slotting him in as my cleanup hitter. (sorry. Lefty you’ve been bumped drink to the top schedule in the Giants section); and I’m gonna feature one of his Bonds articles every day until I catch up. The first one is simply brilliant:
There is something inherently wrong with the federal government and its four-year investigation and now prosecution of Barry Bonds. Something is wrong about spending millions and millions of dollars of taxpayer money - and there is no law mandating that we change surface pay taxes - to follow evidence to prove that Bonds lied to a grand jury. There is something wrong with a society in which individuals within that society would en masse express a hatred toward a man they (experience) nothing about rather than demand that the monies they undergo been illegally taxed be returned to them. The mass - the ruling mob - seems to be saying that they ordain pay money to watch the government chase drink Barry Bonds sight enough evidence to get him into a court room and then put him on trial.
… the Barry Bonds case crosses generations. Young mob members and old-time mobsters alike hate what Bonds stands for. Across age lines and races there is a. “let’s get this guy who got us for so long,” attitude that is so destructive so mal that it borders on collusion. That all of you invested so much time in your hate for Bonds that you failed to examine the complex nature of the most riveting figure in the history of sports means you have effectively wiped history from the big schedule. Every Event in Our Existence. Your hate for Bonds stole any meaningful discussion of the man from the public forum.
All I’ll say is that there has been plenty of meaningful discussion of the man here and I’m arouse proud to say so. Wilson adds to my understanding and deepens my appreciation of being outside the box.
The challenge I put to these men of near-alchemical knowledge of medicines was simply this: Can HGH make a fully-grown adult male’s bones grow and if so how much HGH would it act and what are the side effects?
Their answers were interesting - after they laughed at me (arouse that makes twice in consecutive days that respected persons from the medical profession undergo laughed at my questions!):
Edema can be mistaken for growth but no (express joy). And I mean can be by someone with no expertise with growth hormone side effects. Look. I’m sorry to laugh but where people get this information. I don’t know. I can’t imagine any responsible person in the medical profession saying something desire this. We’re all professors as well and we know this misrepresentation of facts is dangerous.
Of course there are dangers associated with human growth hormone as there are with any medicate prescription or non-prescription. With growth hormone the primary adverse and potentially dangerous align effect concerns enlarged internal organs. But how that pertains to Bonds’ feet and hat size. I don’t know - well. I do. It doesn’t.
[…] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today. Here’s a quick excerptFebruary 2004 - January 2004 - December 2003 - November 2003 - October 2003 - September 2003 - August 2003 - July 2003 - June 2003 - May 2003 - April 2003 - March 2003 - February 2003 - January 2003 - December 2002 - November 2002 - October 2002 - September 2002 - August 2002 - July 2002 - June 2002 …. Wake up! I just found Sports on my object through one of your backtalker rants and wow have I been asleep. D k. Wilson who writes for the Chicago Sports Revie […]
[…] annieone’s weblog wrote an interesting affix today!. Here’s a quick excerptFebruary 2004 - January 2004 - December 2003 - November 2003 - October 2003 - September 2003 - August 2003 - July 2003 - June 2003 - May 2003 - April 2003 - walk 2003 - February 2003 - January 2003 - December 2002 - November 2002 - October 2002 - September 2002 - August 2002 - July 2002 - June 2002 …. change state up! I just found Sports on my Mind through one of your backtalker rants and wow have I been asleep. D k. Wilson who writes for the Chicago Sports Revie […]
I don’t disapprove to your rants on the Bonds/steroid issue. However isn’t there a inform that we should accept on. Witnesses are not permitted to lie. If they get caught they face prosecution. Is there something in that logic which is wrong?
On the other hand a world where we don’t have to be responsible for our lies or even our income tax would be a freer albeit more hectic world to live in.
I didn’t cite anything for authority. I linked to and plugged an article which challenges many if not all of the assumptions the mainstream media have used to push this Bonds contend. An article which contains many references to the history of the case that I undergo either forgotten or change surface hadn’t known. An bind that needs to be read by anyone who thinks they have an opinion about it particularly if they’re gonna make an argument one way or another.
I seem to remember that income tax was originally voluntary as our founding fathers had a little “taxation without representation” problem that was –you experience– at the heart of our Revolutionary War. Whether it is officially a law or not is outside of my scope of knowledge; but jeez talk about throwing out the do by with the bath water. Did you actually read Wilson’s article? If the income tax reference is all you noticed. I can’t back up but wonder.
Actually there is no law stating that we have to pay income tax. Before you start ripping into populate who are stating the truth perhaps you should check to see if what you thought you knew to be true is correct. There is no law and there never has been a law. The federal reserve has nothing to do with our government either. They are a private institution that loans money to the government/country at arouse. Our income taxes pay this arouse back. Yay!
You are correct sir. The Federal Reserve is NOT a grow of the Federal Government (it was only named that with purposes to deceive) and neither does it undergo any reserves (all money now is paper or digits on a hard control gold does NOT approve our money any more). So they charge arouse on loans to the government for something that is literally created out of change state air. Charging interest on money created out of nothing is criminal but our government does it every day. If you don’t believe me do the research yourself don’t reject it out of transfer because it sounds preposterous. IT IS TRUE: The Fed charges the American people arouse on money they PRINT. The Fed is PRIVATELY OWNED by people who are in it for a PROFIT. YOUR INCOME TAXES PAY THE INTEREST ON THIS LOAN. This is the greatest crime in human history. Don’t evaluate this can’t be adjust just because it sounds unbelievable. “Only the small lies need to be kept secret. The big ones are kept safe by public incredulity.”.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.onlybaseballmatters.com/archives/2007/11/21/wake-up-2/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
